A View from Outside the Box

Thanks very much to those that answered yesterday’s poll.  I asked if anyone would like to come forward and explain the appeal of the jeans half mast trend.  I could extrapolate from the poll results that no one likes this fashion statement, but that would be wrong on two counts.  Obviously evidence suggests otherwise as I continue to see people dressing this way, young men specifically.  Also, all statistics can be misleading, warped to suit a particular arguement.  I suspect that those that wear their jeans this way, wouldn’t find their way to my blog and if they did, they wouldn’t be inclined to explain it.  What can we conclude?  Many of us don’t like this look.  It’s irrelevant out of context, the context being prison and sending certain signals by how you wear your jeans.  Many of us find it silly too, in look and in practice.  
The die is cast and therefore I offer you satisfaction.  Many thanks to Zoe for her help - we give you the flaming jeans.  We’ve set fire to the silliness and hope you enjoy it.  

Thanks very much to those that answered yesterday’s poll.  I asked if anyone would like to come forward and explain the appeal of the jeans half mast trend.  I could extrapolate from the poll results that no one likes this fashion statement, but that would be wrong on two counts.  Obviously evidence suggests otherwise as I continue to see people dressing this way, young men specifically.  Also, all statistics can be misleading, warped to suit a particular arguement.  I suspect that those that wear their jeans this way, wouldn’t find their way to my blog and if they did, they wouldn’t be inclined to explain it.  What can we conclude?  Many of us don’t like this look.  It’s irrelevant out of context, the context being prison and sending certain signals by how you wear your jeans.  Many of us find it silly too, in look and in practice.  

The die is cast and therefore I offer you satisfaction.  Many thanks to Zoe for her help - we give you the flaming jeans.  We’ve set fire to the silliness and hope you enjoy it.  

“We may be together in our humanity but at times of acute embarrassment, we feel completely isolated.  The spotlight is shone on our shame and it is a singular experience, we alone suffer it.”
© S. Marian, July 10, 2012
An excerpt from a lighthearted piece titled, “It’s All In The Blush,” to be found on “A View From Outside the Box,” url: adialogue 

“We may be together in our humanity but at times of acute embarrassment, we feel completely isolated.  The spotlight is shone on our shame and it is a singular experience, we alone suffer it.”

© S. Marian, July 10, 2012

An excerpt from a lighthearted piece titled, “It’s All In The Blush,” to be found on “A View From Outside the Box,” url: adialogue 

Liberty is a Washing Machine

The piles of unwashed laundry are getting frisky.  They sit in the corner looking innocent enough, but as soon as I turn my back they’ve multiplied.  Despite training everyone in the house to use the washing machine, I tend to be the only one who possesses the initiative.  According to the L’Ossovatore Romano, the newspaper of the Vatican, the single most influential factor in the emancipation of women is the washing machine.  I don’t agree with this statement as it conveniently downgrades the impact of birth control on women’s lives.  Setting aside the emancipation question for now, what about the humble washing machine – how did it get here and how has it affected our lives? 

 

The first English patent for a washing / wringing machine was issued in 1691, a device a little more primitive than we’re accustomed to today.  Early machines tried to imitate the motion of hands on washing board.  Observation of life on the high seas demonstrated the effectiveness of agitation – sailors would hang their washing overboard in a cloth bag, the dragging motion and water forced through it rendering the clothing clean.  We owe a debt of gratitude to the Canadians for the invention of the first agitation machine around the 1920’s.  In an age of greater equality, one would think that such a labour saving device would be saving the labour of all – not so.  If statistics in the U.S. are representative of other countries, almost 90% of laundry is done by women.  The average American family does 8-10 loads of laundry each week.  Were all of that to be done by hand, there would be no time for much else, not even to complain about inequality.

 

You would imagine then, that every woman would be delighted to own a modern washing machine…I once had a boyfriend who watched his elderly Mother struggle with the wash, first in the twin tub with laborious manual filling, putting laundry and detergent in and waiting for it to agitate sufficiently, then draining it and doing the whole business again and then, into the spinner to further rinse and wring out the water.  That wasn’t enough because then she’d put it through the mangle.  The mangle took the rest of the water out before the laundry could be hung to dry.  Her son bought her a surprise one day, a modern, time saving, space saving washing machine - which she refused to use.  I guess she didn’t like the change.  She kept it next to the twin tub and mangle, a pretty cloth draped over it like a coffin at a wake.  It would eventually become a convenient counter surface for sorting the clothes on.

 

Before twin tubs or mangles there were just tubs, no running water, gas or electricity – needing plenty of time and hard labour.  A single load involved boiling, rinsing and you would need over 50 gallons of water to do one load.  This had to be transported from pump or well or possibly the tap to whatever receptacle you were using.  Consider the carrying, lifting heavy water and water sodden clothes, sheets and all in the days of weighty wool and cotton and voluminous clothing.  I didn’t always have a washing machine and can sympathise with these early women.  Some of my years in Scotland were spent in a small caravan without running water or electricity.  That was fine I thought at first, there is water all around me, I’ll simply take my washing to the nearby shore.  Don’t ever try this!  The first discovery was that detergent (which is also not great for sea life) or ordinary soap doesn’t lather with seawater.  While I was figuring out this conundrum I placed my knickers and socks in the water to soak, forgetting the most important thing.  I was not in a pool or tub but in the sea, a body of water subject to tidal flow. My knickers and socks were flowing into the Atlantic Ocean, on their way to Ireland or who knows where.  Eventually I developed a solution to this problem much like women of the past.

 

I started collecting rainwater in big barrels and this was the beginning of a remedy.  It took some planning but with time and soaking I was able to get through my wash.  Many years later, I still had an unusual appreciation for the washing machine due to my caravan experience.  What a miracle it was to simply put the wash and detergent in and press a button.  One morning some years ago I was gathering wash to do exactly that, put a load on.  I left the door of my front loading machine open while I nipped upstairs to the children’s rooms to get their wash.  Having found nothing, I came back down and closed the door, pushed the button on and then went to have a soak in the bath.  Half an hour passed and then I came out, wondering why I hadn’t heard the washing machine.  I looked at it and it seemed fine, it was on and I couldn’t see any reason why it shouldn’t be running.  I bent down to look in the window and saw, on top of the pile of wash, our small kitten and she wasn’t moving.  The next five minutes were tense as I tapped on the glass, wondering why she wasn’t moving and waiting for the time lock safety device to let me open the door.  When I heard the click of release I threw open the door and pulled, a very dazed looking cat out of the wash.  She had simply gone to sleep.  It was just as well that I came out when I did because I also found out that while she was moving, the load was not evenly distributed and this safety device saved her.  The machine would not run with an unevenly distributed load.  In a few minutes she would have been washed.  She must have climbed in while I was upstairs looking for laundry.  In my home it’s now standard to check our machines for cats before we turn them on.    

 

Despite these traumatic experiences, I still really value the convenience of a washing machine.  Today I read about Ida B. Wells, an amazing heroine of American history and worth looking up.  When she was quite young herself, both her parents and one of her siblings died of yellow fever.  She was determined to keep the family together and worked very hard to do so.  In her words,

“I came home every Friday afternoon, riding the six miles on the back of a big mule.  I spent Saturday and Sunday washing and ironing and cooking for the children and went back to my country school on Sunday afternoon.”  We have it easy comparatively, although we still like to complain. 

 

It’s apparent that labour saving devices such as washing machines have liberated us in one regard, probably freeing us up for other work and expectations that ensnare us in different ways.  I know I wouldn’t like to go back to a scrubbing board and the hard graft of hand washing.  Interestingly, James Dyson, inventor of the famous Dyson hoover and other machines, claims that 15 minutes of hand washing cleans clothes better than one hour in the best German machine available.  He says that hand washing flexes the clothing, which machines cannot do.  Don’t despair; there is hope as he also says that he has invented a machine that does precisely this. 

 

 

 

 Terms:

 

Washboard:  An often wooden or glass board with ridges, of which the fabric can be rubbed up and down vigorously against to scrub and it release dirt.

 

Twin tub:  A machine with two built in basins, one for washing the clothes in requiring the addition of water by hose, the other which spins, for rinsing and wringing the clothes out.

 

Mangle:  A device consisting of two rollers and either a handle to crank it or an electric device.  The clothing is put between the two rollers and the water is squeezed out of it. 

 

Ida B. Wells:  A crusader for justice and defender of democracy.  She was described as a militant and uncompromising leader for her efforts to abolish lynching and establish racial equality.  She challenged segregation decades before Rosa Parks, ran for Congress and attended suffrage meetings. 

 

 

Additional research:

The Daily Telegraph, March 9, 2009

The Great Idea Finder: www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/washmachine.htm

 

Ida B. Wells: www.webster.edu/~woolflm/idabwells.html

 

 

 © S. Marian, July 3, 2012

We were wrong!  It’s not equality or the vote that we should have been fighting for and burning our bras was just a waste of good engineering.  For real emancipation, all we required was washing machines!  Next time you’re feeling stifled, as if the distribution of labour in your home or work is unbalanced, when you feel as if your voice is not being heard - just do a load of wash, that’s true freedom!

If you’re not too busy striking a blow for freedom by doing the laundry, read, “Liberty is a Washing Machine,” to be posted on Tuesday, July 3rd on “A View From Outside the Box,” url: adialogue.

The Who - Baba O'Riley
21 plays

“…I thought to put her recently poor listening to the test.

“Hi Boudica, how was your day?”

“Oh fine.  How was yours?:  She likes to get this question out of the way to make way for really important topics.

“Mine was okay.  I had to go to the doctor who referred me to the hospital for that little scratch on my leg.  It turned out it had become infected badly and with the presence of gangrene, they decided to amputate.  It wasn’t pleasant but now I have a new, top of the line prosthetic leg and you’d hardly know the difference.  I’ll have to learn to walk again but am pleased I’m managing to drive.  I shouldn’t complain though, at least I have one leg.  I’m thinking of painting it purple and calling it Miranda - what do you think?”

“Oh, that sounds good - oh my God, did I tell you about the hilarious thing Chelsea did in class, lol, you won’t believe it…”

© S. Marian, June 26, 2012

An excerpt from “Toddlers with Tampons,” a scholarly study applying T.I.C. methods to the complex world of teenage communication, amongst other things.  To be found on “A View From Outside the Box,” url: adialogue.

(Love this tune, “Baba O’Riley, The Who)

*T.I.C. - Tongue In Cheek.  Image credit to Liverpool John Moores University

Provocation

“Kymali” wondered where she had heard about the Victorian therapy used for treating hysteria in women…(Read, “Something For the Coffee Table” for this to make any sense and to have a laugh), and I think I have an idea.  It is referenced in some literature of the time but more recently,  in the movie “Hysteria,” with the really quite gorgeous Hugh Dancy.  That was the provocation I needed to write a piece I have been toying with for years.  I hope those of you who read it enjoyed it and thanks for your note Kymali.   

Something for the Coffee Table

There is an antiques place, a great big barn outside Dundee in the Perthshire village of Abernyte.  It’s set in verdant, hilly countryside, one hill rolling into the next like waves - a good analogy for this story.  I can and have spent hours there, as it’s full of antique stalls containing the odd, beautiful and ancient of every description.  I have a centuries old Chinese mirror from there, polished metal with a water scene in relief on the other side. I like to imagine who might have used it, what their life was like, what their thoughts, dreams and fears were.  I will never know but of one purchase, the story has reached out to me from the past.

 

One day browsing the treasure trove, I wandered into the household and farming ‘shop.’  This isn’t normally of great interest but I was humouring my beloved.  In the corner on a table was an intriguing thing, a shiny device I had never seen before.  It was approximately one foot long, with a wooden handle and some sort of motor encased within a heavy metal compartment.  Protruding from the back was a crank.  At the bottom of this device there was a circular Bakelite pad, with a gap and then an outer ring of the same.  When you turned the handle the inner disc would move up and down, and depending on how quickly you turned, could go quite fast.  It had a hole in the center of the disc where it appeared something else could be fitted.  The noise it made was akin to a very loud hand drill or ratchet.   On the front of the motor housing, etched into the casing, it said, “Dr. Macaura’s Blood Circulator, Patent number 13932.  I was undeterred by my husband’s, “what do you want to buy that for?”  I thought it would be a fascinating, mysterious ornament to have sitting on the coffee table, and it was.  I never failed to bring out my little machine, adults puzzled over it and children delighted in trying it against their legs, arms, or on the heads of unfortunate sisters.

 

It would have been beautiful had I remained in ignorance, trotting it out at dinner parties to the wonder and amusement of my guests. A year later, it occurred to me to look up the patent number of my table ornament.  I was more than surprised to discover so much information about the Blood Circulator, originally known as the “Pulsacon.”  It was invented in the 1880’s and produced until the 1920’s by the British Appliances Manufacturing Company of Leeds, England.  Apparently, cranking the handle could produce two thousand vibrations per minute.  One example can be found in the London Science Museum with the operational instructions, “It is secured with one hand and the vibrating plate placed over the desired body part.  Turning the handle produces a surprisingly intense vibration over the affected area.”  In the 58 page booklet that came with it, titled, “Death is Stagnation – Life is Vibration,”  Joseph Gerald Macaura claimed that it could cure pain, deafness, anaemia, heart disease, cramp, polio and ‘women’s problems.’

 

As I said, I like to imagine the people that went before me, what these things have meant to them, the context of their lives.  For the woman who possessed this ‘blood circulator’ and I do think it was a woman, she lived in much more constrained times.  The assumptions of her time included the belief that women were prone to hysteria, causing untold problems in the home and for Victorian men in particular.  A common diagnosis was ‘womb disease,’ the symptoms of which were, headaches, irritability, fear of impending insanity and hysteria. 

     I can’t help but smile at these well intentioned, naïve Victorians, as naïve say, as someone buying a ‘vibrational device’ as a coffee table ornament.  Some other Victorian assumptions were that women did not experience ‘copulatory urges,’ or the physical release that came from these encounters and that real coitus only occurred with penetration to physical release. Climax was seen as a sign of good health but not of fornication.  Thus, doctors surmised that womb disease and female hysteria were caused by failure to achieve climax. 

 

By the first century AD, massage of the pudenda had become standard treatment for this common but chronic complaint.  For the next two centuries doctors experimented with all manner of things to ‘shake things loose,’ from vibrating chairs to high powered water douches.’  No matter the device, the goal was the same – to induce ‘hysterical paroxysm.’  This was an improvement for the women, for $2 and some time in the doctor’s office, they experienced temporary relief.  The problem was, it was only very temporary and there were a lot of women.  Dedicated physicians complained of sore hands despite the enormous financial benefits to providing this treatment.  One doctor said it was harder than it looked, likening it to trying to rub your head and pat your stomach simultaneously.   

 

People like “Dr.” Macaura saw a niche in the market and capitalised.  By now some practitioners were feeling a little defensive trying to convey the seriousness of their work.  To meet this demand, vibratory entrepreneurs produced new machines, professional looking and substantial.  One was called the Chattanooga, which was mounted (by the doctor) like a Tommy gun on wheels, to be rolled alongside the patient.  Another popular model was the Carpenter, which hung from the ceiling and looked like a mechanics impactor, or air gun as it’s sometimes called.  Needless to say, a myriad of devices were made, all advertised in a manner to camouflage their intent.  Then, sometime in the 1920’s they seem to have disappeared.  One theory is that the devices began to show up in less salubrious films and their camouflage was gone. 

 

I feel I must speak up for the previous owner of my Blood Circulator.  I am sure there was relief to be had in owning this device but I am quite certain frustration did not disappear.  The context of her life did not allow her a voice in the home (except in domestic matters), in her marriage or in society.  She did not have freedom of choice, the vote and was viewed as irrational, weak and unreliable.  Multiple paroxysms would not have increased her influence, nor diminished her most meaningful impotence. 

 

What of our good doctor though?  He was passionate on the subject of women’s health and surely for that he is to be admired.  At one trade fair in Leeds, he concluded his talk on vibrational therapy with this, “It is the duty of those who took the Hippocratic oath to be fired by imagination and inquisitiveness, to…arrest decay and to amplify life.  Who could find objection to such noble sentiments?  The French apparently.  On May 14, 1914, Gerald Macaura, an American of Irish descent, was arrested and ordered to pay a fine of $600 and sentenced to three years imprisonment.  He was charged with fraud and crimes of ‘vibratory massage.’

 

The famous Pulsacon / Blood Circulator does not sit on my coffee table anymore; instead it now resides in a cabinet of antiquities in my bedroom.  No longer a sitting room ornament but an interesting device with a colourful history and the object of one of my favourite stories.

 

 (Additional information from “Worth Point,” the “Independent,” and Leicestershire County Council)

 

© S. Marian, June 5, 2012

 

           

Read More

Tomorrow we return to Victorian times.  We aim to discover what this lovely lady looks pleased about, what is putting that slight smile on her face?  We look at the context of her life, the attitudes that shaped it and we laugh, oh yes we laugh.  Why?  We laugh because behind that demure smile she has a secret, not even fully understood by herself but nonetheless, a secret.  
Go on, have a laugh and read, “Something For The Coffee Table,” to be posted Tuesday, June 5, on “A View From Outside the Box,” url: adialogue.

Tomorrow we return to Victorian times.  We aim to discover what this lovely lady looks pleased about, what is putting that slight smile on her face?  We look at the context of her life, the attitudes that shaped it and we laugh, oh yes we laugh.  Why?  We laugh because behind that demure smile she has a secret, not even fully understood by herself but nonetheless, a secret.  

Go on, have a laugh and read, “Something For The Coffee Table,” to be posted Tuesday, June 5, on “A View From Outside the Box,” url: adialogue.

Aretha Franklin/Eurythmics - Sisters Are Doin' It for Themselves
30 plays

“Isabella Mary Beeton, tireless advocate of the importance of a woman’s role in the home, editor, publisher, mother, wife and example to millions of women - you are to be admired.  You were both a woman of your time and also before your time.  You highlighted the importance of animal welfare, the use of local and seasonal produce and offered vegetarian choices long before others had even dreamt of these issues.  You asked no one to do anything you were not prepared and able to do yourself and your work ethic was a shining example.  I can’t help but wonder what you would have accomplished today.”  

An excerpt from “Women Have Their Reward,” a piece looking at one Victorian woman and how she changed the lives of many, then and today (except most unfortunately, mine.)  You can find the article on “A View From Outside The Box,” url: adialogue

(Music, “Sisters are Doing it For Themselves,” Annie Lennox - Eurythmics and Aretha Franklin)

“In every-day affairs it is so easy to let things drift.  So tiresome sometimes to leave an interesting book or study to find out what is going wrong in kitchen or household…yet it must be done.”  (From ‘Mrs. Beeton’s Every Day Cookery and Housekeeping Book.”)
I really love this quote because I know that if ‘something is going wrong in kitchen or household’ I am directly connected to it, the wrong has me at the other end of it.  In Mrs. Beeton’s world, it is implied that much of the work is in overseing and instructing, perhaps settling an example.  I also feel like she’s speaking to me directly, it is certainly tiresome to leave an interesting book.  
Read “Good Women Have Their Reward,” and find out just how different attitudes once were, in some cases nothing has changed.  You will find it on “A View From Outside the Box,” url: adialogue.  

“In every-day affairs it is so easy to let things drift.  So tiresome sometimes to leave an interesting book or study to find out what is going wrong in kitchen or household…yet it must be done.”  (From ‘Mrs. Beeton’s Every Day Cookery and Housekeeping Book.”)

I really love this quote because I know that if ‘something is going wrong in kitchen or household’ I am directly connected to it, the wrong has me at the other end of it.  In Mrs. Beeton’s world, it is implied that much of the work is in overseing and instructing, perhaps settling an example.  I also feel like she’s speaking to me directly, it is certainly tiresome to leave an interesting book.  

Read “Good Women Have Their Reward,” and find out just how different attitudes once were, in some cases nothing has changed.  You will find it on “A View From Outside the Box,” url: adialogue.